Masthead:
Editor-in-Chief: Anna Fattaey A26
Managing Editors: Tyler Frojmovich A26, Ethan Guo A27, Lily Turcotte-Keen A28, Anika Parr A28
The Tufts Undergraduate Law Review is a student-led, edited, and written publication dedicated to the exploration and analysis of the most consequential legal and political issues of the present day. The mission of the publication is to provide a forum for undergraduates at Tufts to develop a deeper appreciation and understanding for legal research and the ways in which the law can be used to empower change and seek justice.
TULR publishes a print journal every semester featuring long-from legal analysis from Tufts undergraduate students. Proposal submissions begin early in the semester. If you are interested in writing for the journal, please reach out to tuftslawreview@gmail.com. Additionally, TULR also publishes weekly blog posts. If you are interested in writing or editing for the short-form blogs, please look out for Staff Writer and Editor applications at the beginning of each semester.
Best,
The Tufts Undergraduate Law Review
Ethan Guo | Editor-in-Chief
Leah Munoz, Andrew Finberg, Lily Turcotte-Keen, Anika Parr | Managing Editors
Ravi Palkhiwala | Communications
Lauren Rummler | Social Chair
by Camille Utter American election law operates in a world the Founders could not have imagined.1 Mail-in ballots, early voting periods, and emergency adjustments during
by Avery Bilanin If a masked person in sunglasses and a black hoodie approached a student on the street, ripped their phone from their hand,
by Ravi Palkhiwala In the field of journalism, obtaining information via anonymous sources is a crucial strategy in consequential news stories. Washington Post reporters Bob
by Micaela Vega de las Casas Twelve months and 21 days after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Pre-Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Court
by Olivia Welch The concept of greenwashing has become increasingly prevalent in consumer markets and brand advertising today, particularly in spaces where brands rely on
by Camille Utter For much of modern legal history, courts have operated on the assumption that audiovisual evidence is generally reliable. While witnesses may lie